Audity vs Auditic
Auditic turns a call into a proposal. Audity runs the whole engagement.
Auditic is an affordable tool for taking a discovery call and producing a proposal. That covers the front of the funnel. Audity covers the engagement itself: an evidence-grounded AI readiness assessment, prioritized opportunities, ROI projections, stakeholder memos, and white-label deliverables a boutique firm bills $15K-$50K to produce. They solve different parts of the consulting workflow, and this page is an honest look at where each one fits.
What Auditic is genuinely good at
Auditic is a low-cost, easy entry point for a solo consultant or a small practice that mainly needs help converting a discovery conversation into a clean proposal. At its price point it is an accessible way to standardize the call-to-proposal step, and for someone whose bottleneck is "I keep rewriting proposals from scratch," that is a real, useful job. Audity is not cheaper and is not trying to be. It is built for a different stage of the engagement.
Where Auditic stops for full AI audit work
- It is a discovery-and-proposal tool, not a readiness assessment platform. There is no built-in maturity model, scoring framework, or readiness dimensions to run a rigorous diagnostic against.
- No evidence layer. It does not analyze a client's documents, SOPs, or stakeholder interview transcripts to ground findings in the client's own data.
- No engagement layer beyond the proposal. There is no gap analysis, no ROI / cost-of-inaction modeling, and no role-specific stakeholder memos generated from the findings.
- No team-delegation layer for a firm. It is built around a single consultant's workflow, not associates running a repeatable diagnostic that the lead consultant only reviews.
- White-label depth is limited to the proposal output, not a full branded engagement deliverable.
What Audity does that a proposal tool does not
- A pre-built AI readiness methodology: dimensions, scoring, and a BCG-style maturity model ship with the platform.
- Document and stakeholder-interview analysis that grounds the assessment in the client's actual evidence, with citations.
- The full engagement layer: prioritized opportunities, ROI projections tied to specific gaps, and role-specific stakeholder deliverables.
- White-label across the entire surface, so the diagnostic and every deliverable carry your firm's brand.
- A team layer so associates run the engagement end-to-end and the founder stops being the bottleneck on every project.
Proposal tool vs engagement platform
| Dimension | Auditic | Audity |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Discovery call to proposal. | Full AI readiness assessment to funded engagement. |
| Readiness methodology | None built in. | Pre-built AI readiness model, dimensions, and scoring. |
| Evidence behind the findings | Call notes / inputs. | Document analysis + stakeholder interview synthesis, with citations. |
| Beyond the proposal | Proposal is the output. | Gap analysis, ROI projections, stakeholder memos, final report. |
| Team delegation | Built for a single consultant. | Associates run the diagnostic; method lives in the platform. |
| Engagement size it fits | Light proposals; price-led entry. | $15K-$50K+ AI advisory engagements. |
| Best fit | A solo consultant standardizing proposals on a budget. | A boutique firm productizing its full AI diagnostic. |
Use Auditic when
- You are a solo consultant or very small practice on a tight budget.
- Your main bottleneck is turning discovery calls into proposals.
- You do not need a rigorous, evidence-grounded readiness diagnostic.
- You are not yet running $15K+ engagements that justify a full platform.
Use Audity when
- You run, or want to run, full AI readiness engagements, not just send proposals.
- You need the diagnostic grounded in the client's documents and interviews.
- You want prioritized opportunities, ROI, and a roadmap, not just a proposal.
- Associates should run the engagement without the founder in every call.
- The audit is the front end of a paid $15K-$50K engagement.
Common questions
Is Auditic an AI readiness assessment platform?
Not really. Auditic is built to help consultants turn a discovery call into a proposal. It does not ship an AI readiness methodology, a maturity model, or scoring dimensions, and it does not produce the gap analysis, ROI projections, and stakeholder deliverables that make up a full audit. Audity is the readiness assessment and engagement platform; Auditic addresses the proposal step.
Auditic is cheaper. Why would a firm pay more for Audity?
Because they are buying different things. Auditic's low price reflects its scope: it standardizes the call-to-proposal step. Audity's price reflects that it runs the whole engagement, the evidence-grounded diagnostic, prioritized opportunities, ROI, white-label deliverables, and a team layer, which is the work a firm bills $15K-$50K to deliver. The question is not "which is cheaper" but "which one removes the bottleneck that caps your firm's capacity."
Can I use both?
You can. A consultant who likes Auditic for proposals can keep it. But for the actual AI audit, the diagnostic, the analysis, and the client-ready deliverables, Audity replaces the manual engagement work that a proposal tool does not touch.
What is the real difference between a proposal tool and an engagement platform?
A proposal tool helps you describe and price work you intend to do. An engagement platform helps you actually do the work, run the assessment, analyze the evidence, produce the deliverables, and hand it off across a team, so the diagnostic itself becomes the deliverable the client funds. Auditic is the former. Audity is the latter, built for boutique AI consulting firms.
A proposal is not an engagement.
See how Audity runs the whole AI readiness diagnostic and produces the deliverables your firm bills for.